Art and the Anthropocene, History and Becoming
The Art and Anthropocene, History and Becoming ARC wishes to develop a way of conceiving and experimenting with art today, considering ecological issues (climate change, global health and the state of resources), new behaviours and narratives of the radical changes that involve our society. How can visual artists create in light of this new situation? How can we promote an art form that solicits ecological awareness in a relevant way?
The Anthropocene calls for transformations, sources of imagination and creativity, with respect for nature and life. It calls into question our representations and asks us new questions:
→ What links should we recreate with the Earth and the living?
→ What will we be confronted with: collapses, upheavals, uncertainties, instabilities, renunciations?
→ Isn’t reconnecting with nature and its aesthetics essential for the arts?
The ARC offers in-house sessions, but also invites guest artists and theorists, on subjects that will lay the foundations and issues of artistic creation and art today.
Paul Josef Crutzen, Nobel Prize in Chemistry, proposed the term Anthropocene in 1995, a term that has since been relayed by all media in a significant way. It inspires a worldwide art movement. The works of Anthropocene artists adopt a diversity of forms. Their works, sometimes dematerialized, borrow from the investigative technique of scientists, journalists and whistleblowers. They are also inspired by the practices of farmers or indigenous peoples.
The ARC Art and Anthropocene, History and Becoming is a place for exchange, research, creation, production and resources. It will be hosted throughout the academic year (several talks and contributions). The speakers are specialists from the world of art, the humanities and hard sciences (partnerships with MSH, INRA, Agrosup Dijon, the Urban School of Lyon, Art of Change21, COAL association etc.).
SKILLS DEVELOPED
→ Ease of speaking in relation to work carried out
→ Putting research, tools and techniques into perspective
→ Elaboration of a working method
→ Analysis and identifying conceptual proposals of works produced
EVALUATION
→ Continuous assessment.
→ Individual and collective hangings, internal debates and with invited personalities
EVALUATION CRITERIA
→ Attendance and timekeeping at all classes
→ Quality and relevance of work handed in
→ Ability to put projects into perspective and cite its issues
→ Personal and collective investment
→ Origin and progress of the project, coherence, structuring the approach
→ Risk-taking, production, presentation of work, quality of the creations